Email this Newsletter

Click on news items below for details:












Print this article | Email this article

Howard's Fourth Term Difficulties

For Howard to win this year's election he will have to defy historical trends as only two Prime Ministers have been elected four times since Australia's Federation more than 100 years ago - Menzies and Hawke.

Further complicating the task for Howard is the apparent mood of the electorate on key issues.

Tim Grau, Director, Springboard Australia, analyses the forthcoming Federal election.

The last month has seen three Newspolls released that signal a dramatic shift in Australia's political landscape turning the once inevitable re-election of the Howard Government into anything but certain.

It is not just the 55 to 45 two-party lead Labor has over the Coalition that indicates the Prime Minister's reign and command of the political stage looks seriously at risk.

It is the combined analysis of other recent Newspoll results that should really worry Government Ministers and backbenchers.

With the extended honeymoon for Mark Latham continuing the Prime Minister will have to defy the polls and history to secure a fourth term for his Government.

Preferred Prime Minister

Independent focus group research conducted by Springboard Australia also confirms Latham's elevation has had real benefits for Labor and sends strong warning signals to the Howard Government.

Consistent with the recent Newspolls, Springboard Australia found through its online focus group research, an upward trend for Labor support and a renewed enthusiasm among some voters for a change in direction.

Newspoll has found that as preferred Prime Minister, Latham has almost trebled previous leader Simon Crean's rating up from a dismal 14 percent to 39 percent.

The Prime Minister's rating has dropped from 65 percent to 44 percent over the same period.

Latham has also almost trebled the Leader of the Opposition satisfaction rating from Crean's abysmal 22 to an unprecedented 62 percent.

Amazingly, Latham's historic satisfaction rating came as a result of a 30 percent shift from "uncommitted" to "satisfied". His "dissatisfied" rating of 17 percent remained unchanged.

The most recent poll also found Latham more caring, likeable, in touch with voters and trustworthy than Howard. Crean, by contrast, never came close to Howard on these ratings.

Even on decisiveness, strength, understanding of the major issues and having a vision for Australia, Latham trails Howard by only a few points.


Click graph to enlarge

Focus Group Findings

Springboard Australia's online focus groups confirm this shift in voting patterns across all sectors.

Notably Green and Democrat voters say they are more likely to vote Labor and even a third of Liberal voters said they were now considering voting for Latham and his team.

The research found that voters tend to embrace Latham's fresh approach "fabulous use of language", "passionate, emotional" and "articulate", a "leader and visionary", "not always likeable but possessing a conscience and modern intellect" were some of the positive responses voters expressed in focus groups.

Voters are still cautious of Latham and want to know more about him and his policies. While some were critical of his "wacky ideas", most saw his ability to "think outside the box" and "be talking about the future" as "refreshing" and a strength.

The challenge for Latham and Labor is to maintain his early momentum and extended honeymoon.

As one Labor MP was quoted as saying during last year's leadership challenge, if Crean was in a cinema and shouted "fire" no one would have moved. Crean simply was not resonating with voters and they had stopped listening.

Latham has made their ears prick up, listen and take notice, but it is too early to say they are completely sold on him or his plans.

It is clear the Government is also listening to the new Labor leader and struggling with how to respond.

Despite claiming before the leadership change that the problem for the ALP was not the leader but its policies, immediately after Latham's ascendency the Government focussed its attack on Latham personally, seemingly counter to its own initial strategy.

As a result, the contest has become about Latham's vision versus Howard's rather than the ALP's readiness for government and the Coalition's stewardship.

Herein lies the problem for the Government.

For Howard to win this year's election he will have to defy historical trends as only two Prime Ministers have been elected four times since Australia's Federation more than 100 years ago - Menzies and Hawke.

While the "It's Time" factor applies to governments, history suggests it almost definitely applies to leaders. Even at a State level fourth term Premier's are now a rarity.

Further complicating the task for Howard is the apparent mood of the electorate on key issues.

On two fronts the Government may be in trouble.

Key Issues for Voters

First, the key issues that the Government campaigned on in 2001 are not as important now as they were then. And second, on the issues that are now most important to voters, Labor is seen as best to handle them.

Analysis of Newpoll results on these issues illustrates the point.

In 2001, key issues in the Government's agenda and election campaign post September 11 and Tampa were defence, immigration and leadership. Other strong issues for the Government were taxation, interest rates and industrial relation.

On almost all of these issues the level of importance to voters has declined in recent months.

From a post-Bali high, defence has dropped from 63 to 46 percent; immigration has dropped from 50 to 37 percent; leadership is down from 66 to 63 percent and taxation has dropped from 58 to 53 percent.

By contrast the issues that have grown in importance in voters minds in recent times are health and Medicare (up from 75 to 81 percent); education is up from 79 to 82 percent, family issues, welfare and social issues are up too as is the environment.


Click graph to enlarge

Best Party to Handle Issues

The biggest problem for the Government is that it is these issues that voters think Labor is not only best to handle, but more able to do so than two or three years ago.

On health and Medicare, Labor has a 9-point lead over the Government. On education, Labor has an 11-point lead and on welfare and social issues the ALP leads the Government by a massive 16 points. Labor also leads the Government by 12-points on family issues.

More disturbing for the Government is these trends emerged long before Latham became leader.


Click graph to enlarge

Conclusion

It is clear the Government is now seeking to make up ground in these areas and redress the imbalance.

It is also clear the Government will try to return the political debate and run a campaign on its strengths of defence, immigration, interest rates and taxation.

Whether voters can be convinced again and return Howard for an historic fourth time is the issue.

Prior to the 1996 Federal election some pundits and many Canberra-based staffers and press gallery members weren't prepared to write-off Keating after his come from behind 1993 GST win over John Hewson. "Keating could pull another rabbit out of the hat" they speculated.

After Howard's 2001 "Tampa" win, many again are speculating about political wizardry from Prime Minister Howard.

History and recent polls, however, suggest that like Keating he could become more voter road kill.

Print this article | Email this article

Print this article | Email this article

Federal Election Creates Opportunities

With the Federal election to be held later this year it is the ideal time to seek policy reforms from attentive politicians.

Tim Grau
Founding Director, Springboard Australia


It is going to be a very busy year for politicians, their staff, party campaigners, the media and voters with the Federal due later this year.

While politicians focus on their jobs and futures it provides ideal opportunities for organisations, interest groups and voters to put their concerns or cause before the more attentive ears of government and opposition.

A professional and well-developed lobbying strategy in the lead-up to an election campaign can deliver lasting and much needed policy changes and reform.

A strategic campaign undertaken prior to the 2001 Federal poll for one of Springboard Australia's clients delivered not only the requested election commitment, it resulted in the election promise being delivered in the first post-election Budget and the passage of significant legislative reform.

The key to a successful strategy is a coordinated, constructive and positive approach.

Politicians are used to and often immune to the big stick threatening approach. The "Do this or we will campaign and vote against you" approach might get you some initial media coverage, but is unlikely to get a positive hearing from politicians or their staff, much less deliver the reform you seek.

Individuals or organisations complaining to government about their plight are a daily, sometimes hourly, occurrence.

Like all of us they tend to respond defensively to criticism.

Individuals or organisations approaching politicians and their staff with positive constructive ideas strangely are a rarity.

Strangely, because more often than not at this point in the election cycle they elected officials are desperately seeking news ideas, initiatives to grab voters' attention and positions that differentiate them from their opponents.

Government Ministers are frustrated with the lack of, or staleness of, ideas from their bureaucracy. Opposition spokespersons, short of staff and resources, are crying out for innovative approaches and new ideas.

With politicians survival instincts acutely attuned this year, organisations that implement a well-targeted strategy of early constructive engagement with key decision-makers can have remarkable success in achieving lasting policy reform.

Print this article | Email this article


The 2004 Federal election will be decided in a dozen or more key seats.

Analysis of the notional two-party preferred swing needed for these seats to change hands in the House of Representatives election shows the 2004 poll may be one of the tightest in recent memory.

Further examination reveals that while the contest will be tight the result may see the eventual victor with a large majority.

This is because of the large number of Federal seats with a margin of five percent (5%) or less.

Based on the results of the 2001 election and adjusted for the effect of electoral redistributions in Victoria, Queensland and South Australia there are 31 seats with margins of five percent or less.

The redistributions have also changed the notional composition of the House of Representative so that prior to the

election the Coalition will have 83 seats, Labor 63, Green 1 and Independents3, making at total of 150.

This gives the Government a majority of 16 seats and it would have to lose eight seats to be defeated.

Alternatively, Labor needs to win an additional 13 seats for it to form government.

Critically, to achieve this Labor requires just a swing of 2.2 percent.

But a swing of 3 percent will deliver 18 seats, and 5 percent swing will deliver Labor 24 seats.

Conversely, a swing to the Government of 2 percent will deliver it 7 new seats further increasing its majority. A swing of 5 percent will see Labor lose 16 seats and give the Government a massive majority.

The small margins in these swing seats on both sides has resulted in a tight contest, but not might result in a close outcome if uniform moderate swings occur.


The Swing Seats
 
Coalition Seats
Swing to Lose (%)
Labor Seats
Swing to Lose (%)
1
Solomon (NT)
0.1
Brisbane (QLD)
1.0
2
Dobell (NSW)
0.4
Wakefield (SA)
1.3
3
Canning (WA)
0.4
Kingston (SA)
1.3
4
Adelaide (SA)
0.6
Stirling (WA)
1.6
5
Hindmarsh (SA)
1.0
Hasluck (WA)
1.8
6
Parramatta (NSW)
1.2
Bonner (QLD)
1.9
7
Paterson (NSW)
1.4
Swan (WA)
2.0
8
Herbert (QLD)
1.5
Bass (TAS)
2.1
9
Deakin (VIC)
1.6
Rankin (QLD)
2.4
10
Richmond (NSW)
1.7
Chisholm (VIC)
2.7
11
Eden-Monaro (NSW)
1.7
Banks (NSW)
2.9
12
Hinkler (QLD)
2.2
Greenaway (NSW)
3.1
13
McEwen (VIC)
2.2
Ballarat (VIC)
3.2
14
Longman (QLD)
2.5
Bendigo (VIC)
3.6
15
Moreton (QLD)
2.6
Lowe (NSW)
3.8
16
Gippsland (VIC)
2.6
Lilley (QLD)
4.6
17
Page (NSW)
2.8
Jagajaga (VIC)
5.3
18
McMillan (VIC)
2.9
Lingiari (NT)
5.3
19
Bowman (QLD)
3.1
Capricornia (QLD)
5.5
20
Petrie (QLD)
3.5
Cowan (WA)
5.5
21
La Trobe (VIC)
3.7
Melbourne Ports (VIC)
5.7
22
Makin (SA)
3.7
Braddon (TAS)
6.0
23
Kalgoorlie (WA)
4.3
Barton (NSW)
6.0
24
Cowper (NSW)
4.7
 
 
25
Dunkley (VIC)
5.2
 
 
26
Corangamite (VIC)
5.4
Green Seat
 
27
Lindsay (NSW)
5.5
Cunningham (NSW)
2.2
28
Dickson (QLD)
6.0
 
 
29
Aston (VIC)
6.0
 
 
30
Moore (WA)
6.0
 
 

Print this article | Email this article

Print this article | Email this article

Federal Ministers vs Shadow Ministers

While Federal elections campaigns tend to focus on the respective party leaders, senior Ministers and Shadow Ministers will play an important role in the formation of the Government's and Opposition's policy agenda.

Here we have provided a listing of the key Government Ministers and Labor Shadow Ministers who will shape the political and policy debate for the remainder of the year.

Key Ministers and Shadow Ministers
Portfolio
Government Minister
Shadow Minister
Prime Minister The Hon John Howard Mark Latham
Transport and Regional Services The Hon John Anderson
(Deputy Prime Minister)
Martin Ferguson
Treasurer The Hon Peter Costello The Hon Simon Crean
Trade The Hon Mark Vaile Stephen Conroy
Foreign Affairs The Hon Alexander Downer Kevin Rudd
Defence The Hon Robert Hill Chris Evans
Robert McClelland
Finance and Administration The Hon Nick Minchin The Hon Bob McMullan
Health and Ageing The Hon Tony Abbott Julia Gillard
Attorney-General The Hon Philip Ruddock Nicola Roxon
Environment and Heritage The Hon Dr David Kemp Kelvin Thompson
Communications, Information Technology and the Arts The Hon Daryl Williams Lindsay Tanner
Kate Lundy
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry The Hon Warren Truss Gavan O'Connor
Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs The Hon Amanda Vanstone Stephen Smith
Kerry O'Brien
Education, Science and Training The Hon Dr Brendan Nelson Jenny Macklin
(Deputy Leader of the Opposition)
Family and Community Services The Hon Kay Patterson Wayne Swan
Industry, Tourism and Resources The Hon Ian Macfarlane Kerry O'Brien
Employment and Workplace Relations The Hon Kevin Andrews Craig Emerson

Print this article | Email this article

Print this article | Email this article

Calendar of Events

1 - 4 MARCH 2004
FEDERAL PARLIAMENT SITS

8 - 11 MARCH 2004
FEDERAL PARLIAMENT SITS

9 - 12 MARCH 2004
NSW PARLIAMENT SITS

16 - 18 MARCH 2004
QLD PARLIAMENT SITS

16 - 19 MARCH 2004
NSW PARLIAMENT SITS

22 - 25 MARCH 2004
FEDERAL PARLIAMENT SITS

27 MARCH 2004
NSW LOCAL GOVERNMENT ELECTIONS
QLD LOCAL GOVERNMENT ELECTIONS

29 MARCH - 1 APRIL 2004
FEDERAL PARLIAMENT SITS

30 MARCH - 2 APRIL 2004
NSW PARLIAMENT SITS

9 APRIL 2004
GOOD FRIDAY

11 APRIL 2004
EASTER SUNDAY

12 APRIL 2004
EASTER MONDAY

20 - 22 APRIL 2004
QLD PARLIAMENT SITS

25 APRIL 2004
ANZAC DAY

26 APRIL 2004
ANZAC DAY PUBLIC HOLIDAY

27 - 29 APRIL 2004
QLD PARLIAMENT SITS

If you have an event or know of an important date that you would like to include in the next Springboard Australia Newsletter or Political Briefing please forward the details to: mail@springboard.net.au.

Print this article | Email this article

Subscription

We do not wish to inconvenience anyone by sending mail they do not wish to receive. So please, read below if you wish to be removed from future mailings.

Springboard Australia's newsletters and political briefings are designed to give you a quick update on key activities happening in government, politics and the media that are important to you and your organisation.

We will keep it brief, factual and relevant providing you with tips, news, events and insight to the world of politics, media, business and the community.

If you find this information interesting, please pass it onto your colleagues.

If you have any suggestions or comments we welcome your feedback. Send your views to mail@springboard.net.au.

If you would like to subscribe to Springboard Australia's Political Briefings and Newsletters click here.

To be removed from these mailouts please click here.

For more information on Springboard Australia, our activities and services please visit www.springboard.net.au.

 
Privacy & Legal Matters
© Springboard Australia 2000-2005